Axiomatic Foundations for Compromise Theory†
نویسندگان
چکیده
We provide a characterization of the symmetric and weighted versions of the Euclidean compromise solution for multiobjective optimization problems first proposed by P.L.Yu. These solutions minimize a measure of the distance between a feasible set and the utopia point of that set, and are closely related to solutions that have been proposed in the bargaining with claims literature. We provide new axiomatizations of the symmetric and weighted Nash Bargaining Solutions. Our characterizations of the compromise solutions employ axioms that are, in a certain sense, dual to those used in these new axiomatizations of the Nash solutions. We also provide characterizations for solutions that are dual to the Egalitarian and Kalai-Smorodinsky solutions.
منابع مشابه
A Model of Temptation-Induced Compromise
This paper models menu choice problems in which the decision maker (DM) faces temptation at the ex ante stage of choice and responds to this temptation by making a compromise. We introduce a new class of utilities, called the category model, which captures this phenomenon and provide axiomatic foundations for this model. Our theory provides an approach to modeling temptation that is distinct fr...
متن کاملPhilosophical and Axiomatic Grounding of Fuzzy Theory
At times, it is essential to re-affirm the philosophical and axiomatic foundations of Fuzzy Theory in order to search and discover new avenues of research and to shed a new light onto basic assumptions. For such a purpose, first, the perspectives of Pierce and Zadeh are review with regards to determinacy and indeterminacy. Secondly, the ontological and epistemological foundations of both the Cl...
متن کاملAxiomatic Foundations of Expected Utility and Subjective Probability
This chapter provides a critical review of the theories of decision making under risk and under uncertainty and the notion of choice-based subjective probabilities. It includes formal statements and discussions of the various models, including their analytical frameworks, the corresponding axiomatic foundations, and the representations.
متن کامل“general System” Defined for Predictive Technologies of A-gsbt (axiomatic-general Systems Behavioral Theory)
This article presents the foundations of A-GSBT (Axiomatic-General Systems Behavioral Theory) by providing a clear logical definition of general system. Such a definition is critical for devising mathematical models for predicting results in behavioral systems. The purpose of A-GSBT is to provide an Options Set to construct a theory with predictive technology applications to various behavioral ...
متن کاملFoundations of Mathematics Vol . 1 ( 1934 ) Paul
§ 1. The Problem of consistency in axiomatics as a logical decision problem. The state of research in the field of foundations of mathematics, to which our presentation is related, is characterized by three kinds of investigations: 1. the development of the axiomatic method, especially with the help of the foundations of geometry, 2. the founding of analysis by today’s rigorous methods through ...
متن کامل